mnot’s blog

Design depends largely on constraints.” — Charles Eames

Standards Entries

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

Distributed Hungarian Notation doesn't Work

It used to be that when you registered a media type, a URI scheme, a HTTP header or another protocol element on the Internet, it was an opaque string that was a unique identifier, nothing more. Sure, there are some...

this entry’s page (4 comments)

Monday, 4 April 2011

HTTP POST: IETF Prague Edition

Last week found lots of HTTP-ish folks in Prague for IETF 80. In short, the good bits: HTTPbis HTTPbis had a cracker of a meeting, with three RFC2616 authors and representatives of all five major browsers in the room....

this entry’s page (3 comments)

Tuesday, 1 March 2011

Last Call: Content-Disposition

The IESG has received a request from the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis WG (httpbis) to consider the following document: 'Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)' <draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.txt> as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans...

this entry’s page

Friday, 1 October 2010

HTTP Roundup: What’s Up with the Web’s Protocol

I’m going to try to start blogging more updates (kick me if I don’t!) about what’s happening in the world of HTTP. HTTPbis The effort to revise the core HTTP specification (RFC 2616) is going nicely, albeit slowly. Given...

this entry’s page (8 comments)

Friday, 23 July 2010

Thou Shalt Use TLS?

Since SPDY has surfaced, one of the oft-repeated topics has been its use of TLS; namely that the SPDY guys have said that they’ll require all traffic to go over it. Mike Belshe dives into all of the details...

this entry’s page (7 comments)

Thursday, 6 May 2010

RFC5861: HTTP Stale Controls

On a bit of a roll, RFC5861: HTTP Stale Controls has (finally) been published as an Informational RFC. As discussed before in “Two HTTP Caching Extensions,” these are very useful ways to hide latency and errors from your end...

this entry’s page (5 comments)

Wednesday, 7 April 2010

RFC5785: Well-Known URIs

One of the nagging theoretical problems in the Web architecture has been finding so-called “site-wide metadata”; i.e., finding something out about a Web site before you access it. We wrestled with this in P3P way back when, and the TAG...

this entry’s page (3 comments)

Friday, 3 July 2009

Come to the Stockholm IETF!

The Stockholm IETF meeting is shaping up to be an interesting one (and not just because it’s in such a beautiful city). As announced on the mailing list, we are having a HTTPbis working group meeting. It looks like...

this entry’s page

Thursday, 25 June 2009

The Resource Expert Droid

A (very) long time ago, I wrote the Cacheability Engine to help people figure out how a Web cache would treat their sites. It has a few bugs, but is generally useful for that purpose. However, as I’ve got...

this entry’s page (15 comments)

Tuesday, 14 April 2009

Counting the ways that rev="canonical" hurts the Web

I had a lovely holiday weekend in Canberra with the family, without Web access. Perhaps I’ll blog about that soon — Canberra being in my opinion one of the nicest overlooked cities in the world — but that will...

this entry’s page (30 comments)

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

The FSF, IETF and Use Patents

Over the past few weeks the Free Software Foundation has had its knickers in a twist about TLS authentication — specifically, its patent encumbrance; That patent in question is claimed by RedPhone Security. RedPhone has given a license to...

this entry’s page (2 comments)

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

Stop it with the X- Already!

Sometimes, it seems like every time somebody has a great idea for a new HTTP header, media type, or pretty much any other protocol element, they do the same thing. Rather than trying to figure out how to fit...

this entry’s page (19 comments)

Friday, 21 November 2008

OAuth in Minneapolis

There are lots of new “Web 2.0” specs emerging — many beginning with “o” — that are both exciting and concerning. Exciting because the Web is still evolving and still being applied to new problems, but concerning because the...

this entry’s page

Thursday, 16 October 2008

/site-meta

Metadata discovery is a nagging problem that’s been hanging around the Web for a while. There have been a few stabs at this problem (including at least one by yours truly), but no real progress. This is both unfortunate...

this entry’s page (17 comments)

Friday, 4 July 2008

The WS-Empire Strikes Back... feebly

Here’s a gem on a little-used mailing list: As most of you know, over the last several years fairly good progress has been made on standardizing Web services. Many Web services specifications have, in fact, been standardized in W3C...

this entry’s page (9 comments)

Thursday, 15 May 2008

Atom gets a new audience

Huh. The Atom Format RFC has been out for a while, and as one of the authors, I get the odd mail now and again asking a question or just saying “thanks.” In the last week or two, however, there’s...

this entry’s page (1 comment)

Wednesday, 2 April 2008

Moving the Goalposts: “Use” Patents and Standards

It’s become quite fashionable for large IT shops to give blanket Royalty-Free licenses for implementation of “core” technologies, such as XML, Web Services and Atom. I’ll refrain from linking to any of them, as the purpose of this post*...

this entry’s page (8 comments)

Sunday, 17 February 2008

POST and PATCH

It’s 7am, I’m sitting in the Auckland Koru Club on my way home and reading the minor kerfuffle regarding PATCH with interest. For me, the critical difference between PATCH and POST is generality; PATCH is a generic method (as...

this entry’s page (2 comments)

Friday, 4 January 2008

Cache Channels

The stale-while-revalidate and stale-if-error extensions aren’t the only fiddling we’ve been doing with the HTTP caching model. Now that Squid 2.7 is starting to see daylight, I can explain about a much more ambitious project — Cache Channels. In...

this entry’s page (4 comments)

Wednesday, 12 December 2007

Two HTTP Caching Extensions

We use caching extensively inside Yahoo! to improve scalability, latency and availability for back-end HTTP services, as I’ve discussed before. However, there are a few situations where the plain vanilla HTTP caching model doesn’t quite do the trick. Rather...

this entry’s page (16 comments)

Sunday, 9 December 2007

Why Revise HTTP?

I haven’t talked about it here much, but I’ve spent a fair amount of time over the last year and a half working with people in the IETF to get RFC2616 — the HTTP specification — revised. That effort...

this entry’s page (9 comments)

Saturday, 8 September 2007

5005

Feed Paging and Archiving (nee Feed History) has finally made it to a standards-track RFC. For many non-traditional (read: non-blog) applications of Atom, I think archived feeds in particular are going to be vital. I’m already using it in...

this entry’s page (3 comments)

Wednesday, 10 May 2006

Vendor-pires

Anne-Thomas Manes extolls the virtues of WS-*; The single, most important feature that inspires my enthusiasm about WS-* is that it has universal support from all the major vendors. Ah, there we are; major vendors. What she’s basically saying...

this entry’s page (18 comments)

Thursday, 20 April 2006

DOM vs. Web

Back at the W3C Technical Plenary, I argued that Working Groups need to concentrate on making more Web-friendly specifications. Here’s an example of one such lapse causing security problems on today’s Web. Safety in HTTP HTTP methods have a...

this entry’s page (24 comments)

Friday, 7 April 2006

Are Namespaces (and mU) Necessary?

It’s become axiomatic in some circles — especially in WS-* land, as well as in many other uses of XML — that the preferred (or only) means of offering extensibility is through URI-based namespaces, along with a flag to...

this entry’s page (13 comments)

Wednesday, 15 March 2006

WS-Transfer, WAKA and the Web

Microsoft and friends (of the keep your enemy closer variety, I suspect) have submitted WS-Transfer to the W3C. I found the Team comment interesting; e.g., WS-Transfer can therefore be seen as an underlying protocol-independent version of HTTP, i.e. bringing...

this entry’s page (10 comments)

Wednesday, 10 August 2005

Separating the Data Model from its Serialisation

For some time, I’ve noticed that people defining XML formats spend an inordinate amount of time talking about the structure of the format. This is especially apparent in standards working groups, where hours — no, days — can be...

this entry’s page (11 comments)

Friday, 22 July 2005

Transformational Standards

Don Box (whose blog doesn’t seem to be taking comments any more, so I’ll do it over here) points out some very cool technology he’s using, Microsoft’s Office Communicator. Sounds very slick, I’m jealous (with my old tech phone...

this entry’s page

Friday, 15 July 2005

Don’t use the ‘feed’ URI Scheme

It’s been covered before elsewhere, but just a friendly reminder: ‘feed’ URIs are bad for the Web, as are any that are used solely for dispatch (e.g., ‘itms’, ‘pcast’). I’m looking at you, Apple. Interestingly, Apple also supports doing...

this entry’s page (3 comments)

Monday, 27 June 2005

Perspectives on the Addressing Experiment

I don’t talk much about it here, but I’m honoured to be the Chair of the W3C Web Services Addressing Working Group. This is something of an experiment for the W3C, so I gave an update on its progress...

this entry’s page (2 comments)

Monday, 7 February 2005

The Map is Not the Territory

Werner makes an excellent point; [W]e need to continue to take care that we do not consider The Model to be The Truth. The web based internet is a massive organic process that is similar to Nature, and we...

this entry’s page (3 comments)

Monday, 24 January 2005

JSON and XML

I’m intrigued by the JSON effort. While many people (and vendors) have chosen XML for data interchange because it’s not platform- or vendor-specific, these folks have chosen the other path; by leveraging the serialisation of data structures in ECMAScript...

this entry’s page (16 comments)

Sunday, 23 January 2005

WS-Who's on First?

There are MEPs in SOAP and MEPs in WSDL. WS-Addressing doesn't have MEPs, but it does allow you to create patterns of messages.Meanwhile, SOAP has bindings and WSDL has bindings, and WS-Addressing have bindings too. But, a SOAP binding binds an underlying transport, a WSDL binding binds an abstract interface, and an Addressing binding binds abstract properties.That's not the properties in SOAP, by the way, which aren't exactly the same as the properties in WSDL.

this entry’s page (1 comment)

Wednesday, 19 January 2005

On How Google Fixed Comment Spam

More than a year after my modest suggestion, Google takes a step to fix comment spam. Hopefully, other people who re-publish Web content (like mailing list archives) will start doing this as well. Perhaps the most interesting thing about...

this entry’s page (1 comment)

Wednesday, 8 September 2004

HTTP Header Registries

An update to the Internet-Draft that provides initial values for the HTTP Header Message Registries is now available.

this entry’s page (2 comments)

Thursday, 2 September 2004

Innocent Fraud

...I have learned that to be right and useful, one must accept a continuing divergence between approved belief -- what I have elsewhere called conventional wisdom -- and the reality. And in the end, not surprisingly, it is the reality that counts.-- John Kenneth Galbraith, "The Economics of Innocent Fraud"I'm just starting this book, but it's pretty thought-provoking so far.

this entry’s page

Saturday, 23 August 2003

Registering Media Types

I've had a fairly large and annoying bee in my bonnet for the past few months, regarding media type registration. It started buzzing when I tried (and failed) to register a media type for RSS, and has continued to...

this entry’s page (1 comment)

Sunday, 22 June 2003

Economics of standards

Looks like a good to-read list: John Beatty: Economics of Standards (via John Beatty, one of my fellow BEA-ers; hi John!)...

this entry’s page (1 comment)

Wednesday, 28 May 2003

While we're talking about standards...

I agree with just about everything that Jim Waldo says here (at least for protocol standards). Well said!...

this entry’s page

Sunday, 10 November 2002

IETF Transparency

Finally, the IESG puts its money where its mouth is; this tool allows you to see the status and individual AD's comments about a particular I-D. It's only a start, but at least you have some idea of what's going...

this entry’s page