[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [syndication] Namespaces discussion



I think this is part of the challenge, RSS is liked because it is simple so
any use of namespaces must be simple too.
Regarding Rael's comment that I should post what may be expected at the
other end regarding a namespace that is a URL (it was really Rael who summed
up the whole namespace confusion so eloquently, I was just paraphrasing his
comments to me) - I'll follow up shortly.
DG

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
David Galbraith - Chief Architect, founder
Moreover.com - the webfeed company
david@moreover.com
415-577-8828 (US)
0777-565-8880 (UK)
favorite webfeed:
http://www.moreover.com/xml

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Winer [mailto:dave@userland.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 6:35 PM
> To: syndication@egroups.com
> Cc: foRK
> Subject: [syndication] Namespaces discussion
>
>
> On Scripting News yesterday I said: "I don't like namespaces.
> This is based
> on my own confusion when I see all those esoteric labels all over XML
> documents. I've been very clear about this all along."
>
> On the UserLand discussion group there are two comments from people who I
> know to be smart (I've worked with them for years) who agree, Ed
> Draper and
> Paul Howson.
>
> http://discuss.userland.com/msgReader$18263
>
> http://discuss.userland.com/msgReader$18277
>
> If you want to learn about how busy web developers view namespaces, go
> challenge them, ask them questions, try to explain namespaces and why they
> are good, but please do it respectfully.
>
> I think we would all learn a lot from the interchange. Maybe you
> can win Ed
> and Paul over. It could be an interesting discussion.
>
> Dave
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> IT Professionals: Match your unique skills with the best IT projects at
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3381/14/_/304461/_/962329045/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>