RE: [syndication] Re: Thoughts, questions, and issues.

["Per Kreipke" <per@onclave.com>]

> That's fine. But I'm going to keep going. I'm tired of debating
> this stuff.
> I've been having a lot of fun in the last couple of months, and it's only
> been in the last few days that it started to turn into the usual
> hand-wringing, trying to keep you from hearing things that apall
> you. Enough
> is enough. These guys want to own RSS. I put a ton of work into
> it. Somehow
> reconcile that with your appalled-ness. This is not a nice thing that's
> going on. I'm apalled. Welcome Per Kreipke to the land of the
> apalled. Dave

Heh, Hoisted by my own hyperbole! My apologies, Dave, 'apalled' was too
strong a word. How about dismayed or disappointed?

I understand getting fed up with the debate but it hardly excuses
incivility. How do you reconcile that with your 'flame resistant policy'?

So you've put a lot of work into RSS (and a lot of money). Does that make it
yours? Why do you think an open group like RSS-DEV (which you still haven't
joined) is going to 'own' it in the future?

> This is not a nice thing that's going on. I'm apalled.

Watching the process on RSS-DEV, it looks a lot more like concensus building
than spec-by-cabal.

>From the land of the appalled, glad you could join me,
Per.

[this opinion is my own]