Re: [syndication] Re: Thoughts, questions, and issues.

[Jonathan Eisenzopf <eisen@pobox.com>]

Aaron Swartz wrote:
> 
> Paulo Gaspar <Paulo.Gaspar@krankikom.de> wrote:
> 
> > There are a lot of private little "RSS processors" and this standard
> > does not care much about them.
> 
> That's not true. The authors were clearly _very_ concerned about backwards
> compatibility. There's a lot of junk in the spec that I'd like to see taken
> out, but can't be removed because of backwards-compatibility. If you have an
> RSS 0.9 processor that doesn't work with this spec, let the authors know --
> perhaps they can change things.
> 
This is true. If there are processors that are broken, I think it
would be helpful for this group to know about it so we can
provide fixes or perhaps modify the proposal. I'd also like to
point out that 0.9 RSS 0.91 caused more problems from 0.9 that
1.0 does.

-- 
Jonathan Eisenzopf    |  http://motherofperl.com    
eisen@pobox.com       |  http://perlxml.com
Perl Hacker           |  http://dc.pm.org