Re: Thoughts, questions, and issues.

[Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>]

Following up on my own message:
> I don't believe it adds any complexity, though.  The complexity
> comes from people _thinking_ they need to understand RDF to use the
> rdf:about attribute.  They don't, just copy <link> there and forget
> about it.

On the part about people thinking they need to understand RDF to use
RSS, I think that does stem from the RSS1.0 proposal making such a
heavy emphasis that RSS1.0 uses/supports RDF and somehow RDF knowledge
is required to support RSS.  That isn't necessary.  RSS1.0 is about
RSS, the authors could have/can put RDF compatibility notes ("RSS does
these things so that RDF tools can interpret RSS files: ...") in an
appendix and had the same level of RDF support.

  -- Ken