RE: [syndication] Re: [RSS-DEV] ANN: Fusion Juggler Radio

["Dave Seidel" <dave@mindreef.com>]

I agree, Tuner is pretty good.  Nobody says a product can't have a *similar*
name to a competing product!  :-)  In fact, it's a good thing, I think.
Helps nail down the metaphor, also helps people see that they're in the same
(or a similar) space.

-----Original Message-----
From: peteb@aliaron.com [mailto:peteb@aliaron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:39 AM
To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [syndication] Re: [RSS-DEV] ANN: Fusion Juggler Radio


--- In syndication@y..., "Bill Kearney" <wkearney99@h...> wrote:
>
> Perhaps "Fusion Juggler Tuner" is a suitable alternative?

'Tuner' is pretty good. We were actually looking for a *category*
name for the low-end content consumer edge of the content supply
network. The space seems characterized by the confusion that
typically precedes the development of accepted product categories
with associated comparative feature lists, etc. If there is an
accepted category name then it can be used as the product name,
preceded by a strong brand, e.g. 'Fusion Juggler <category name>' and
a non-associative name is then typically counter-productive. For
example, if we were in the app server business ( we're not ) then we
would have a 'Fusion Juggler Application Server.'

Pete




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/