RE: [syndication] Re: Healing the community (was: Dear Ken)

["Jeff Barr" <jeff@vertexdev.com>]

I agree. I was disagreeing with Aaron's assertion that numbers
alone would be adequate differentiation..

Jeff;

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Winer [mailto:dave@userland.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:51 PM
To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [syndication] Re: Healing the community (was: Dear Ken)


Yes, but Microsoft didn't have to deal with IBM  promoting a different
operating system using the Windows name.

RSS is not Windows. It's nowhere near as famous. It doesn't have the
advertising and PR budget of Windows, nor the teams of marketing and sales
people to explain the subtleties. Further, every subsequent version of
Windows is meant to obsolete all previous versions. Not true here.

RSS is damaged goods. We're (hopefully) trying to undo the damage, so that
the users can get busy making their magic happen.

Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: [syndication] Re: Healing the community (was: Dear Ken)


> Jeff Barr <jeff@vertexdev.com> wrote:
>
> > Windows is the main brand and the suffixes serve to further
> > identify within the brand.
>
> Yes -- sorry for not giving more context here. The Windows example was to
> compare it with RSS-Semantic and RSS-Simple -- further identification
within
> the RSS "brand" / "trunk" / "project" or whatever you want to call it.
>
> --
> [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/