[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [syndication] More thoughts...
Hi,
I've tried repeatedly to get to the appropriate folks at Netscape, and
Netscape/AOL. I've fallen off the end of cold trail after cold trail.
There just doesn't seem to be anyone there anymore who knows a whole heck of
a lot about RSS; witness the DTD disappearance. If there is someone, they
indeed seem to be in a corner far flung from anyone who has the ability to
speak up. I wish this weren't so and hopefully someone will speak up.
Rael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 12:04 AM
> To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [syndication] More thoughts...
>
>
>
> Just curious... does anyone know if Netscape has a position about
> this? AFAIK, they don't care, but have we confirmed that?
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:55:57PM -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > More mail came in after this... don't think it will fly... ah, well.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:35:38PM -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > >
> > > Well. That's a lot of messages in one evening.
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't think we're ready for a poll right yet.
> > >
> > >
> > > Question -
> > >
> > > How about 0.9x (all of them) keeps the RSS name, 1.0 goes to
> > > RSS-Semantic?
> > >
> > > This is a compromise. There is an argument that it will be confusing
> > > to users, but no more than the difference between 0.9 and 0.91, I
> > > think. It says that yes, the RDF tree came out of the same swamp, but
> > > they're on a different track now. 0.9x arguably has the moral
> > > advantage (to balance the half-name-change), as it is the root;
> > > -semantic is a subclass, a special case, an anomoly, if you will.
> > >
> > > RSS 0.9 might even be referred to as RSS-Semantic 0.9. Has a certain
> > > symmetry to it.
> > >
> > > Just putting it out there...
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Nottingham
> > > http://www.mnot.net/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham
> > http://www.mnot.net/
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>