Re: [syndication] RSS 0.91's Future

[Julian Bond <julian@netmarketseurope.com>]

In article <LPBBLCJIHOIDJNIFKFBPGELFCNAA.alis@contentrelations.com>,
Alis Marsden <alis@contentrelations.com> writes
>If RSS ceases development at RSS 0.91, regardless of whether RSS 0.92+/ RSS
>1.0+ are called RSS-Something or something else altogether, what happens if
>RSS 0.91 needs changes?
>
>I'm not talking further development of RSS 0.91 but just the stuff that
>makes logical sense and needs doing.

The de facto standard out there is actually 0.91 and a half. eg 0.91
with limits removed, encoded (mostly) html in the description and
sometimes <link> and/or <title> optional. Regardless of the spec, this
is the real 0.91   

-- 
Julian Bond eMail: julian@netmarketseurope.com
HomeURL: http://www.shockwav.demon.co.uk/ 
WorkURL: http://www.netmarketseurope.com/
WebLog: http://roguemoon.manilasites.com/
M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173  T: +44 (0)20 7420 4363  
ICQ:33679668 tag:So many words, so little time