Re: [syndication] Re: Re: eXtensible Content Syndication (the next step for OCS)

[burton@relativity.yi.org]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Duynstee, Teun" <teun.duynstee@macaw.nl> writes:

<snip>

> 
> What I tried to say was that you have (IMHO) two options:
> 1) state in your spec that no-one should use prefixes and that
> http://schemas.openprivacy.org/08/10/2001/xcs must always be the default
> namespace.
> 
> 2) Show an example in the spec using prefixes, thus explaining that all of
> the attributes need to be in the XCS namespace and prefixed accordingly.
> 
> I personally prefer the second option, but I could understand choosing the
> first, because the format would be easier to parse (though it is beyond me
> that people try to parse XML themselves).

OK... I see your point.   I will think about this...  I am leaning towards
proposal 2 as my first XML was really just an example.

Kevin

- -- 
Kevin A. Burton ( burton@apache.org, burton@openprivacy.org, burtonator@acm.org )
        Cell: 408-910-6145 URL: http://relativity.yi.org ICQ: 73488596 

Intellectual 'property' is to property as fool's gold is to gold.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt

iD8DBQE7euchAwM6xb2dfE0RAhQpAJ9bXOJhYw2AIbIzYzqS4f59xgpHIgCgu0Op
/4dUauAYkXunREvAZy424+4=
=X6KS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----