[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks

To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks
From: Julian Bond <julian_bond@voidstar.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 14:42:18 +0000
In-reply-to: <1006692701.3c00e95d99c50@webmail.uni2.dk>
References: <20011124233644.A2685@mnot.net> <1006692701.3c00e95d99c50@webmail.uni2.dk>

In article <1006692701.3c00e95d99c50@webmail.uni2.dk>, John Gotze
<john@gotzespace.dk> writes
>Syndication of bookmarks/links is not optimal in RSS 0.91, which I use. I see 
>you, Mark, use, RSS 1.0. Do you think this is the optimal way to syndicate 
>bookmarks?

Why is 0.9x sub-optimal for bookmarks? Surely it's just <item> =
bookmark, <link> = URL, <title>=text description? 

-- 
Julian Bond    email: julian_bond@voidstar.com
CV/Resume:         http://www.voidstar.com/cv/
WebLog:               http://www.voidstar.com/
M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173  T: +44 (0)192 0412 433
ICQ:33679568 tag:So many words, so little time

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks
  - From: John Gotze <john@gotzespace.dk>
- Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks
  - From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Re: RSS feeds for bookmarks
  - From: "Aaron of Montreal" <aaron_of_montreal@yahoo.ca>

References:
- RSS feeds for bookmarks
  - From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks
  - From: John Gotze <john@gotzespace.dk>

Prev by Date: Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks
Next by Date: Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks
Previous by thread: Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks
Next by thread: Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread