[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [syndication] Re: RDF under patent attack?
In article <Pine.LNX.4.30.0201030911440.14366-100000@tux.w3.org>, Dan
Brickley <daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk> writes
>On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Julian Bond wrote:
>> Prepare to be slashdotted, blogdexed and daypopped.
>> This is a test.
>> Let's see just how much of a media storm we can generate.
>
>I fear that might prove counter-productive. Let's take this slowly, and
>not get panicked by their FUD into treating their claims with any
>seriousness. Perhaps a big fuss is inevitable, but at this stage I don't
>think we need to go looking for it.
After writing this, and then reading the archives on the RDF list and
everything else I could find on the subject, I reached the same
conclusion. To all those directly involved, consider this a statement of
support. But we should wait for your lead.[1]
--
Julian Bond email: julian_bond@voidstar.com
CV/Resume: http://www.voidstar.com/cv/
WebLog: http://www.voidstar.com/
M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173 T: +44 (0)192 0412 433
ICQ:33679568 tag:So many words, so little time