Bill Kearney <ml_yahoo@ideaspace.net> wrote:
I keep questioning it, but I'm still convinced that an RSS aggregator really needs a database.I disagree. The trouble is the old George Carlin joke, "you can't have everything, where would you put it?" What I am finding is that by having adatabase of the items, even the ones I don't bother 'reposting or bookmarking' Ifind I can build inferences. Were they not in a database it would be nearly impossible to query this way.
Um, Bill I think we're agreeing here. I think a database is essential. I'm using Mysql, you're using Exchange. And I'm using the word database loosely here. As opposed to only storing the current contents of a feed.
-- Julian Bond Email&MSM: julian.bond@voidstar.com Webmaster: http://www.ecademy.com/ Personal WebLog: http://www.voidstar.com/ CV/Resume: http://www.voidstar.com/cv/ M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173 T: +44 (0)192 0412 433