[no subject]

> it has been fun ;)  nice to confirm some gossip from the larger community,
> while disproving other bits...

Likewise, we're seen a fair number of articles discussing RSS.  A great many of
them have, thus far, been fundamentally flawed.  They were all written with the
best of intentions, of course, but usually lacked some key bits of background.
Fortunately the authors have all been quick to engage in debate and have amended
their materials as a result.  Not to everyone's satisfaction of course.

I'm not saying "your're wrong" more that the perspective you're espousing
doesn't parallel mine and, from my experience, doesn't match that of conditions
in the field.

-Bill Kearney