[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [syndication] shared feed lists
- To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [syndication] shared feed lists
- From: Jeremy Zawodny <jeremy@zawodny.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:42:49 -0700
- In-reply-to: <02ac01c39259$0b4a7700$200ca8c0@wkearney.com>
- References: <182301c39256$09fc7a90$6401a8c0@murphy3> <02ac01c39259$0b4a7700$200ca8c0@wkearney.com>
- Sender: Jeremy Zawodny <jzawodn@thermal>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:42:42AM -0400, Bill Kearney wrote:
>
> Why is using a <head> section <link> tag not sufficient?
It is sufficient if one has the ability to add <link> tags to their
<head>. But what if you cannot?
> Where robots.txt works, in that it's intended as a tool that something
> potentially causing TREMENDOUS amount of traffic can use as a guide, is useful
> the same can hardly be said of an index file of this nature. The favicon.ico
> thing is little more than just another vendor embrace and extend hack.
The analogy isn't quite right here. favicon.ico generates a lot of
traffic because most browsers request it. robots.txt is requested by
most well-behaved robots. This file is intended to be a simple
bootstrap--a way of finding the feeds. It should be requested
infrequently and by relatively specific tools.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@Zawodny.com> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/