[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [syndication] RFC: myPublicFeeds.opml
- To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [syndication] RFC: myPublicFeeds.opml
- From: Jeremy Zawodny <jeremy@zawodny.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:48:35 -0700
- In-reply-to: <1afb01c392a3$76b761c0$6401a8c0@murphy3>
- References: <1afb01c392a3$76b761c0$6401a8c0@murphy3>
- Sender: Jeremy Zawodny <jzawodn@thermal>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:35:25PM -0400, Dave Winer wrote:
>
> It's been recommended that the file name be 8.3, meaning eight
> characters in the name, followed by a three-character extension on
> the theory that this would increase the number of places it could be
> deployed.
Really? Are there web servers that can't handle larger filenames?
It's been so long since I've had to think about that problem that I
assumed we were well past it.
Did the unnamed suggestors happen to name a piece of software that's
afflicted by this disease? I'm not saying they're lying. I'm just a
bit surprised and skeptical.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@Zawodny.com> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/