[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [syndication] discovery vs information

To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [syndication] discovery vs information
From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@syndic8.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:02:04 -0400
References: <BKELLDAGKABIOCHDFDBPAENEECAA.danny666@virgilio.it> <1ef901c39329$c6bcccb0$6401a8c0@murphy3>

C'mon Dave, Mark asked for some decorum.

Stop insulting TBL and the w3c folks.  They do try and if it's not up to your
liking then consider making that point on their list (as opposed to here)  That
thread actually has applicable points to consider, not just what you insinuate.

-Bill Kearney
Syndic8.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>


> And then Tim Bray proposes a straw man..
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0297.html
> Which calls for a new HTTP header.
> Which might solve the problem, in about a thousand years or so.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [syndication] discovery vs information
  - From: Mark Fletcher <markf@wingedpig.com>

References:
- RE: [syndication] discovery vs information
  - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Re: [syndication] discovery vs information
  - From: "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [syndication] discovery vs information
Next by Date: Re: [syndication] Feed List Format
Previous by thread: RE: [syndication] discovery vs information
Next by thread: Re: [syndication] discovery vs information
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread