Re: Formatting skipDays and skipHours...

["Clinton Gallagher" <csgallagher@metromilwaukee.com>]

> Message: 1         
>    Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:21:25 -0600
>    From: "Clinton Gallagher" <csgallagher@metromilwaukee.com>
>    Subject: Formatting skipDays and skipHours...
> 
> The RSS 2.0 specification is ambiguous. The specification [1] 
> clearly states how to represent the values but fails to 
> indicate how to delineate a collection of values. Commas? 
> Spaces? Other?
> 
<snip />
> 
> <%= Clinton Gallagher 
> [1] http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/skipHoursDays#skiphours
>
> Message: 2         
>    Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:13:03 -0800
>    From: Phil Ringnalda <philringnalda@gmail.com>
>    Subject: Re: Formatting skipDays and skipHours...
> 
<snip />
>
> <skipHours><hour>8</hour><hour>9</hour></skipHours>
> 
> I'll leave it up to someone else to do the standard 
> "mod_syndication is so much better specified" (without 
> mentioning that it is probably even less widely supported).
> 
> Phil Ringnalda

Thank you, I went to the web and found more comments and
implementation insights. Your comments regarding mod_syndication 
is making too much sense. 

Well Phil, do you know of any collections of "best practice" 
documents for developers to gain insight rather than picking
a bit and a byte at a time?

<%= Clinton Gallagher