Re: Re[2]: [syndication] RSS Modularization Demonstration

["Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>]

>>Currently they point to Rael's urls above. Ultimately they can point to
wherever the final specs end up. In the shifting world of RSS it makes sense
to use a persistent url for the specs.

Maybe I don't understand what you're saying here, but did the full-week's
worth of work I did resurrecting the RSS 0.91 spec go unnoticed on this
list?

http://backend.userland.com/rss091

If so, I'm not going to put any more work into this, that's for sure.

In the meantime..

Are there any content developers on this list interested in the evolution of
RSS?

I find the activity towards "modularization" to be dry and uninteresting.
I'd like to see some new information float through RSS-space, asap. I
believe that imperfect element names are fine, I am interested in getting
new information to flow from writers to readers.

Dave