RE: [syndication] Some suggestions for RSS .92

["Paulo Gaspar" <Paulo.Gaspar@krankikom.de>]

Ken,

All you say makes the list presented at:
   <http://rsswhys.weblogger.com/discuss/msgReader$25>
clear but does NOT make any kind of consensus obvious.


Now, on forking you end up saying:

> Who's to say that the minority owners get to decide
> that it's the majority that must fork, and not the minority owners who
> must fork?

Since:
 - There is no clear RDF standard owner;
 - There is no clear way of finding out who is the majority (not all RSS
   users are list members and not all are active posters);
 - The "most different" standard is less hurt by taking a new name...

...I still think that the forking idea I posted makes much more sense.


Have fun,
Paulo


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken MacLeod [mailto:ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 00:40
> To: syndication@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [syndication] Some suggestions for RSS .92
> 

<ReallyBigTextFromMeAndKen>
  Read Ken's post if you want.
</ReallyBigTextFromMeAndKen>