Re: [syndication] Some suggestions for RSS .92

[Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>]

"Paulo Gaspar" <Paulo.Gaspar@krankikom.de> writes:

> All you say makes the list presented at:
>    <http://rsswhys.weblogger.com/discuss/msgReader$25>
> clear but does NOT make any kind of consensus obvious.

All I'm saying there is that had that there been a formal working
group composed of even simply the posting members of the time who had
a known contribution to RSS, the results would be much clearer now.

The cycle is being repeated again, by the way.  The lack of a clear
working group and/or process for RSS 0.91+ is stalling those efforts
(not interference, as suggested).  Proposals, discussion, and
resolutions should happen relatively quickly.  Yet without a known
process, people are trying to suggest or propose things, are being
told their not doing it right (what?!), it's not clear who can make
things official, and it's certainly not clear what or whose act needs
to be accomplished to actually get things adopted.

  -- Ken