[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rss story fact checking



--- In syndication@y..., Mark Nottingham <mnot@m...> wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 06:57:32AM -0700, Dave Winer wrote:
> > As one of the authors of 0.91, which is the spec that most people
> > code their RSS channels to
> 
> What's the basis for this claim? Most of those that I stumble across
> are 0.9 or 1.0, though I just look at the ones that I'm interested
> in, so it's not representative.
> 
as part of the rss story i mentioned, i asked ian davis to run 
his rss survey script again for me for xmltree.com's db, and he 
came up with the following figures (may 3, 2001):

Version    Num   Percentage  
RSS 0.90:  1275  44.7% 
RSS 0.91:  1488  52.1% 
RSS 1.0 :  86     3.0% 
RSS 0.92:   5     0.2% 
Total  2854 

By Ian Davis, CTO of Calaba Ltd. (and Internet Alchemy).

So RSS 0.91 is the most popular format at xmltree.com, with 
0.90 coming in a close second.

- best

Andy King
http://webref.com

> Cheers,
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/