[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rss story fact checking
--- In syndication@y..., Mark Nottingham <mnot@m...> wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 06:57:32AM -0700, Dave Winer wrote:
> > As one of the authors of 0.91, which is the spec that most people
> > code their RSS channels to
>
> What's the basis for this claim? Most of those that I stumble across
> are 0.9 or 1.0, though I just look at the ones that I'm interested
> in, so it's not representative.
>
as part of the rss story i mentioned, i asked ian davis to run
his rss survey script again for me for xmltree.com's db, and he
came up with the following figures (may 3, 2001):
Version Num Percentage
RSS 0.90: 1275 44.7%
RSS 0.91: 1488 52.1%
RSS 1.0 : 86 3.0%
RSS 0.92: 5 0.2%
Total 2854
By Ian Davis, CTO of Calaba Ltd. (and Internet Alchemy).
So RSS 0.91 is the most popular format at xmltree.com, with
0.90 coming in a close second.
- best
Andy King
http://webref.com
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/