Re: [syndication] Re: rss story fact checking

["Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>]

I'm citing numbers that Andy gave me that come from Ian Davis who compiled
his data from XML-Tree.

Apparently 0.90 and 0.91 account for 96 percent, and 0.91 alone accounts for
52 percent.

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: <aking@internet.com>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [syndication] Re: rss story fact checking


> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 06:57:32AM -0700, Dave Winer wrote:
> > As one of the authors of 0.91, which is the spec that most people
> > code their RSS channels to
>
> What's the basis for this claim? Most of those that I stumble across
> are 0.9 or 1.0, though I just look at the ones that I'm interested
> in, so it's not representative.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>