Re: [syndication] Re: RFC: Clearing confusion for RSS, agreement for forward motion

["Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>]

>>Ad hoc extensions, overloading of elements, and RSS 0.92+ seem to suggest
otherwise.

Look, according to the proposal RSS 0.92 becomes something completely
different, not called RSS at all, so take it off the table.

I think a collegial community of developers could have worked together to
extend RSS. I am now giving up on that. Perhaps that isn't clear. You won
that one.

I want RSS to be frozen at 0.91.

You back off, we back off.

Be kind to RSS.

Dave