Re: [syndication] Re: RFC: Clearing confusion for RSS, agreement for forward motion

["Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>]

Dave,

What do you think is a good name for your simple .92 format ??

Seth

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>
To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: [syndication] Re: RFC: Clearing confusion for RSS, agreement
for forward motion


> >>This is not about backing off, standing down, or the like.  It's about
> stepping forward to the middle.  And it's that middle we're figuring out.
>
> No. I want to do what I can to have RSS mean something so we can promote
it
> as a simple content syndication format. That's all I want to do here. I'm
> where Netscape was in 1999, fed up with this way of doing development.
It's
> slow, wastes tons of time, and misses the mark by a mile. That's my
opinion,
> of course, and my choice, ymmv. That's why I put item #9 in my roadmap.
I'm
> trying to clean up here before moving on.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>