[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [syndication] 0.92 divergence from 0.91

To: "'syndication@yahoogroups.com'" <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [syndication] 0.92 divergence from 0.91
From: Nick Lothian <nl@essential.com.au>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:11:19 +0930

> 
> Slashdot still uses 0.9...
> 
> 	http://slashdot.org/slashdot.rdf
> 
> Just curious...
> 

Actually, that is RSS 1.0

Regards
  Nick Lothian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 0.92 divergence from 0.91
  - From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- RE: [syndication] 0.92 divergence from 0.91
  - From: "Rael Dornfest" <rael@oreilly.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [syndication] do patents threaten syndication?
Next by Date: Re: 0.92 divergence from 0.91
Previous by thread: RE: [syndication] 0.92 divergence from 0.91
Next by thread: Re: 0.92 divergence from 0.91
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread