[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95

To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
From: Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 01:00:43 +0100
In-reply-to: <20011017151228.F3188@mnot.net>
Mail-followup-to: syndication@yahoogroups.com
References: <20011016095122.A1240@mnot.net> <9qj0ah+fhjc@eGroups.com> <9qjj4d.3vujs4n.1@ID-99504.news.dfncis.de> <20011017095303.A3188@mnot.net> <20011017203519.G27419@webarchitects.co.uk> <20011017151228.F3188@mnot.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.23i

Hi

On Wed 17-Oct-2001 at 03:12:29PM -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> I don't think the alternates have to be completely equivalent; for
> example, your printed version might very well leave off the
> navigation.

I agree, it might also have fully qualified URI's listed for all the
links in a page -- underlined blue text isn't all that useful on paper
:-)

Chris

-- 
Chris Croome 
http://mkdoc.com/
http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/

References:
- Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
  - From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
  - From: "Mark Paschal" <markpasc@mindspring.com>
- Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
  - From: Karl Ove Hufthammer <huftis@tiscali.no>
- Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
  - From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
  - From: Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>
- Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
  - From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>

Prev by Date: Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
Next by Date: Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
Previous by thread: Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
Next by thread: Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread