[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [syndication] Archival RSS: Toward Weblog Portability
- To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [syndication] Archival RSS: Toward Weblog Portability
- From: Thomas Hofmann <Thomas@th-o.de>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 15:53:05 +0200
- References: <127e01c30f84$942ea350$0201000a@murphy3> <04ce01c30fe3$cd878770$2000a8c0@wkearney.com> <14df01c30fe7$33e31d10$0201000a@murphy3>
Hallo everybody,
please tell me, what a picture should bring us this?
Who is everytime right? I think no one. If it were
so, he were god.
"Oh, we should build him a church!" ;-)
I think it would help the subscribers of this list more, if
we would get some technical facts insteed of
an assertion without understandable explanatory statement.
Could be some truth in this opinion?
wish you al a nice day, Thomas
> You're so wrong about that. I wish you'd show self-respect before you go
> saying rubbish like this. What a low road you live on Kearney. Uck! Dave
>> Uh, not for RSS it doesn't. At least nowhere near as flexibly as one
>> does
> in
>> something like MT.
>>
>> That's why I had to write my own RDF writer for Radio. Frontier as well
> (which
>> is a whole other morass of spaghetti code)
>>
>> Take care when you try to correct me Dave, you're wrong most of the time.
>>
>> -Bill Kearney
>> > Actually Radio has a fully general templating capability. Dave
--
---[ Thomas Hofmann, 84405 Dorfen - mailto:Thomas@th-o.de ]---