Re: [syndication] Archival RSS: Toward Weblog Portability

["Bill Kearney" <ml_yahoo@ideaspace.net>]

Yet you don't offer any proof Dave, just insults.

Looking at how Frontier generates it's RSS, it's output from a very ugly bit of
extremely gnarly code.  Contrast this with how MT generates it from a template,
nice and neat and totally under user control, via the web interface, no
programming required.  Making any changes to the Frontier output *REQUIRES*
writing code and uses no part of a template.  Likewise is true for Radio.  How
do I know this?  I'M LOOKING AT THE CODE RIGHT NOW.  Not a template anywhere in
sight.

Dave, you're once again wrong.  Whether or not you have an opinion of me doesn't
change the FACTS.  So please, spare me your petty insults.

-Bill Kearney


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>
To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [syndication] Archival RSS: Toward Weblog Portability


> You're so wrong about that. I wish you'd show self-respect before you go
> saying rubbish like this. What a low road you live on Kearney. Uck! Dave
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Kearney" <ml_yahoo@ideaspace.net>
> To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [syndication] Archival RSS: Toward Weblog Portability
>
>
> > Uh, not for RSS it doesn't.  At least nowhere near as flexibly as one does
> in
> > something like MT.
> >
> > That's why I had to write my own RDF writer for Radio.  Frontier as well
> (which
> > is a whole other morass of spaghetti code)
> >
> > Take care when you try to correct me Dave, you're wrong most of the time.
> >
> > -Bill Kearney
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>
> > To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 9:54 PM
> > Subject: Re: [syndication] Archival RSS: Toward Weblog Portability
> >
> >
> > > Actually Radio has a fully general templating capability. Dave